IT Infrastructure Assessment using the COBIT 2019 Framework
pdf

Keywords

admission
COBIT
COBIT 2019
capability level
gap
infrastucture
domain focus

How to Cite

Rifa’i, A. F., Sumarsono, Muhammad Fauzan Al Baihaqi, & Yazid Azfa Yasa. (2025). IT Infrastructure Assessment using the COBIT 2019 Framework . IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2023.5152

Abstract

The Admission Office is responsible for student enrollment, and since 2013, the admission process at UIN Sunan Kalijaga has been supported by information technology. To assess the current state of the IT infrastructure in this university, the COBIT 2019 Framework was used. This study identifies five key domains in need of improvement: APO12 (manage risk), which focuses on managing IT-related risks within an organization, BAI10 (manage configuration), to ensure that IT services are delivered efficiently and effectively, DSS02 (manage service requests & incidents), involves the process of providing quick and efficient responses to user requests and handling various incidents, DSS03 (manage problems), to provide timely and effective support to consumers, ensuring their issues are addressed, their needs are met, and DSS04 (manage continuity), to ensure that the organization can respond effectively to incidents and disruptions, minimizing downtime and maintaining business continuity. The results showed that the capability levels for these domains in UIN Sunan Kalijaga were at Level 1, while the target was Level 4, leading to a capability gap of 3. The gap indicates that considerable effort is required to improve and achieve the desired level of maturity, and this research proposes some recommendations to improve the IT infrastructure.

https://doi.org/10.14421/ijid.2023.5152
pdf

References

P. Harmon, Business Process Change: A Guide For Business Managers and BPM and Six Sigma Professionals. 2007.

K. Ratheeswari, “Information Communication Technology in Education,” Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, vol. 3, p. 45, May 2018, doi: 10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.169.

D. Putra, A. Walid, T. Susanti, and A. Asari, “Development of MIKIR E-Module Through Service-Learning Community Based Research,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 11, pp. 545–563, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10448.

N. Istiq’faroh, S. Rabia, Z. Abidin, H. Hendratno, A. Wibowo, and M. Hoang, “Local Wisdom-Based Articulate Storyline Application: A New Way to Improve Reading Literacy for Elementary School Students in the West Papua Region,” Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, vol. 5, pp. 180–187, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v5i2.1114.

A. Donaldson, “An Exploration of School Principals’ Leadership Strategies to Incorporate Technology into Curriculum Delivery: Successes, Challenges and Possibilities,” 2025. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.25263.04004/1.

K. Krismadinata, M. Minangsih, Y. Yahfizham, and U. Verawardina, “Perencanaan Enterprise Architecture Pelayanan Informasi Meteorologi Klimatologi dan Geofisika,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 145–154, 2020, doi: 10.21456/vol10iss2pp145-154.

S. Mhlongo, K. Mbatha, B. Ramatsetse, and R. Dlamini, “Challenges, opportunities, and prospects of adopting and using smart digital technologies in learning environments: An iterative review,” Heliyon, vol. 9, no. 6, p. e16348, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16348.

A. Afzal, S. Khan, S. Daud, Z. Ahmed, and A. Butt, “Addressing the Digital Divide: Access and Use of Technology in Education,” vol. 3, pp. 883–895, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.54183/jssr.v3i2.326.

Y. K. Dwivedi et al., “Setting the future of digital and social media marketing research: Perspectives and research propositions,” Int J Inf Manage, vol. 59, p. 102168, 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102168.

U. Education, “Beyond Borders: Leveraging Technology Sustainable Development Goals in Education , 1,” vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 90–100, 2024, doi: 10.33084/ijue.v2i2.8586.

M. M. Msambwa, K. Daniel, and C. Lianyu, “Integration of information and communication technology in secondary education for better learning: A systematic literature review,” Social Sciences and Humanities Open, vol. 10, no. November, p. 101203, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101203.

S. Garg, “Role of ICT in Higher Education: Opportunities & Challenges,” Research Journal of Philosophy & Social Sciences, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 170–176, 2021, doi: 10.31995/rjpsss.2021v47i02.22.

E. Mustikasari, Y. S. Gondokaryono, and A. Heriati, “Perancangan Organisasi Teknik Informasi dan Arsitektur Informasi dalam Kerangka Enterprise Architecture (Studi Kasus: Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Kelautan & Perikanan RI),” Jurnal Sistem Informasi (Journal of Information Systems), vol. 2, no. 10, pp. 118–125, 2014.

P. T. Harris, Enterprise Architecture and Its Role in Solving Business Issues: Case Study of the NSW Department of Lands. 2008. doi: 10.1109/CIT.2008.Workshops.98.

T. O. Group, “The Open Group.” [Online]. Available: https://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf8/

R. J. Benson, T. L. Bugnitz, and B. Walton, “From business strategy to IT action: right decisions for a better bottom line,” p. 328, 2004, [Online]. Available: http://books.google.com/books?id=2wYZbaKzuwAC&pgis=1

Y. M. Maulana, Z. R. M. Azmi, and D. N. E. Phon, “Business-IT Alignment through Enterprise Architecture in a Strategic Alignment Dimension: A Review,” Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 55–67, 2023, doi: 10.26594/register.v9i1.3084.

H. Alghamdi, “Assessing the Impact of Enterprise Architecture on Digital Transformation Success: A Global Perspective,” Sustainability (Switzerland), vol. 16, no. 20, 2024, doi: 10.3390/su16208865.

The IT Governance Institute, COBIT 4.1: Framework for IT Governance and Control. 2007. [Online]. Available: http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Framework+Control+Objectives+Management+Guidelines+Maturity+Models#4

K. Surendro, Implementasi Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi. INFORMATIKA, 2009.

Rini Audia and B. Sugiantoro, “Evaluation and Implementation of IT Governance Using the 2019 COBIT Framework at the Department of Food Security, Agriculture and Fisheries of Balangan Regency,” IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 152–161, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.14421/ijid.2022.3381.

F. Novianto and M. U. Siregar, “Evaluation of E-Government Using COBIT 5 Framework (Case Study of Sistem Database Pemasyarakatan Implementation in Ministry of Law and Human Rights in the Special Region of Yogyakarta),” IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 74–83, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.14421/ijid.2019.08205.

M. S. A. K. Mardlian, M. T. Nuruzzaman, S. ’Uyun, and B. Sugiantoro, “Evaluation of IT Governance at Islamic Boarding Schools in the Special Region of Yogyakarta based on the COBIT 5 Framework,” IJID (International Journal on Informatics for Development), vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 262–271, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.14421/ijid.2022.3988.

S. Zulaiha, “Perancangan Enterprise Architecture,” Instiut Teknologi Bandung, 2009.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth. SAGE Publications Inc., 2017.

S. Nita and S. Kartikawati, “Analysis of the Impact Narrative Algorithm Method, Pseudocode and Flowchart Towards Students Understanding of the Programming Algorithm Courses,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 835, p. 12044, May 2020, doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/835/1/012044.

L. Kurniawati, “Analisis perencanaan strategi teknologi dan sistem informasi perusahaan,” Information Management for Educators and Professionals, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 125–138, 2017, [Online]. Available: http://ejournal-binainsani.ac.id/index.php/ISBI/article/view/382

D. W. Aksnes, L. Langfeldt, and P. Wouters, “Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories,” Sage Open, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1177/2158244019829575.

R. Sessions, “Comparison of the Top Four Enterprise Architecture Methodologies,” 2010.

A. Carrera-Rivera, W. Ochoa, F. Larrinaga, and G. Lasa, “How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research,” MethodsX, vol. 9, p. 101895, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895.

W. Mangoki, D. Manongga, and A. Iriani, “IT Governance Design in XY University using COBIT 2019 Framework,” Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 111–122, 2024, doi: 10.21456/vol14iss2pp111-122.

J. Yuan, T. Wulyatiningsih, and S. Adam, “Applying COBIT 2019 to Design a Tailored IT Governance System for PT . Telekomunikasi Seluler Manado Branch,” vol. 6, pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.60083/jidt.v6i2.572.

M. Weske, Business Process Management. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2007.

M. Sahi, I. A. G. Suwiprabayanti Putra, and I. G. A. Sri Melati, “Audit Procedures to Manage Information Systems Based on the DSS02 Domain in the COBIT5 Framework at Double - Six Luxury Hotel Seminyak,” Applied Information System and Management (AISM), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 57–62, 2021, doi: 10.15408/aism.v4i2.19922.

N. Luh, P. Yuliandri, G. Putu, K. Juliharta, and N. M. Estiyanti, “Implementasi Framework Cobit 2019 Pada Audit Tata Kelola Sistem Informasi Pada Dinas Penanaman Modal dan PTSP Kota X,” Jurnal TEKINKOM, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 41–53, 2023, doi: 10.37600/tekinkom.v6i1.713.

T. Maulariqa Insani, Samsudin, and A. Ikhwan, “Implementasi Framework Cobit 2019 Terhadap Tata Kelola Teknologi Informasi Pada Balai Penelitian Sungei Putih,” Jtik, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 50–60, 2022.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches, 2nd ed. Sage Publications, 2003.

E. M. Lompoliu, G. B. R. F. Francolla, G. R. Mandoya, and M. D. Walangitan, “Information Technology Governance Analysis Using The COBIT 2019 Framework at XYZ Institution,” CogITo Smart Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 346–358, 2022, doi: 10.31154/cogito.v8i2.427.346-358.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.