Systematic Literature Review: Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif pada Pembelajaran Matematika
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14421/jpm.2022.72.02Keywords:
Creative thinking skill, math learning, systematic literature reviewAbstract
This study aims to examine the efforts that can be made in improving creative thinking skills in mathematics learning. The method used is systematic literature review, consisting of three stages, namely planning, conducting, and reporting. The planning stage is the determination of protocols, including determining topics and determining article search criteria. The conducting stage is implementation, including article search, article selection, and data synthesis. The reporting stage is the final stage in systematic literature review, including writing the results of systematic literature review in accordance with a predetermined format. Based on the study of 15 international articles and 5 national articles, the application of the Problem Based Solving learning model is the most widely made effort to improve creative thinking skills. In addition to Problem Based Learning, there are several efforts that can be made to improve creative thinking skills, including by applying Open Ended, Open Inquiry, Project Based Learning, Resource Based Learning, Creative Problem Solving, Realistic Mathematics, or Guided Inquiry in mathematics learning.
Downloads
References
Ardeniyansah, & Rosnawati, R. (2018). “Implementation of Problem-Based Learning in terms of Student Mathematical Creative Thinking.” Journal of Physics, 1, 1097.
Ariandari, W. (2015). “Mengintegrasikan Higher Order Thinking dalam Pembelajaran Creative Problem Solving.”
Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2015). S”kills for the 21st Century: What Should Students Learn?” Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Fatah, A., Suryadi, D., Sabandar, J., & T. (2016). “Open-ended approach: an effort in cultivating students’ mathematical creative thinking ability and self-esteem in mathematics.” Journal on Mathematics Education, 7(1).
Istianah, E. (2013). “Meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif matematik dengan pendekatan model eliciting activities (MEAs) pada peserta didik SMA.” Infinity Journal, 2(1).
Kadir, Lucyana, & Satriawati, G. (2017). “The Implementation of Open-Inquiry Approach to Improve Students’ Learning Activities, Responses.” Journal on Mathematics Education, 8(1).
Kirana, C., Tejo, E., & Cahyowati, D. (2020). “An implementation of open-ended approach with TPS (Think Pair Share) to improve creative thinking skills for student of class VII-B of SMP Negeri 9 Malang An Implementation of Open-Ended Approach with TPS (Think Pair Share) to Improve Creative Thinking .”
Kitchenham, B., & Charters, S. (n.d.). Guidelines for performing Systematic literature reviews in Software Engineering. In Keele University and Durham University Joint Report.
Maryani, N., Marlina, N., & Amelia, R. (2019). “Upaya Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Peserta didik SMK Kelas X Melalui Pendekatan Open Ended Pada Materi Trigonometri.” Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1).
Muchsin, & M. (2013). “Application of Project Based Learning Models in Improving Creative Thinking of Students at Physics Lessons in SMA Bandar Baru.” Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal, 3(2).
Muhtadi, D., & Sukirwan, S. (2018). “Implementasi Pendidikan Matematika Realistik (PMR) Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik dan Kemandirian Belajar Peserta Didik.” Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(1).
Ningsih, S. R., Disman, Ahman, E., Suwatno, & Riswanto, A. (2020). “Effectiveness of using the projectbased learning model in improving creative-thinking ability.” Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4).
Pratiwi, R. D., Ashadi, & S. (2019). “Profile of Students’ Creative Thinking Skills using Openended Multiple Choice Test in Science Learning.” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1-5.
