##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##
Principles of Online Learning Assessment: A Literature Review Between Western Education Theory and Islamic Education Theory
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Purpose – The right assessment strategy can reduce the number of academic dishonesties during online learning in the pandemic era. Academic dishonesty is a problem considered normal but has a detrimental impact on the development of a nation. Therefore, instructors need to know the principles of assessment that can reduce the number of academic dishonesties in universities.
Design/methods/approach – This study uses a qualitative approach with a literature study technique. This literature comes from several online assessment books, articles, handbooks, and others. The procedure used in this study involves selecting a topic, developing themes, selecting problems, searching for literature in the database, and selecting and evaluating literature based on these problems.
Findings – The results of this study are in the form of online learning assessment principles that can be applied in designing assessment activities. First, design a student-centered assessment that includes self-reflection. Second, design and include grading rubrics for assessing contributions to the discussion and assignments, projects, and the collaboration itself. Third, include collaborative assessment. Fourth, encourage students to develop skills in providing feedback. Fifth, use assessment techniques appropriate to the context and learning objectives. Sixth, design an assessment that is clear, easy to understand, and guaranteed success in the online environment. Seventh, ask students for input on how the assessment is carried out.
Research implications – This study contributes to the development of literature regarding the online learning assessment process, especially in universities.
Originality/value – Future research should be able to test these online learning assessment principles to find empirical evidence of their effectiveness.
Keywords:
Downloads
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##
Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright Notice
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Al Ghazali, A. H. M. (2014). Ayyuha al Walad (pp. 1–96).
Al Muhasibi, 1999, Adabun Nufus, Lebanon, Darul Kutub al ilmiyah
Anshori, T. Al, Malang, U. I., Budiya, B., Malang, U. I., Utami, N. S., & Malang, U. I. (n.d.). Untuk Mengatasi Kejenuhan Belajar Online Di Era Pandemi. 17(September 2021), 106–119.
Arnold, S. D. (2012). Assessing student learning online: Overcoming reliability issues. IADIS International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2012, Celda, 189–196.
Ashworth, P., Bannister, P., & Thorne, P. (1997). Guilty in Whose Eyes? University students’ perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment. Studies in Higher Education, 22(2), 187–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079712331381034
Asy’ari, M. H. (2000). Adab Alim Mutaalim (Cetakan V). Maktabah Turats Al Islami. https://ia800501.us.archive.org/19/items/AdabAlimMutaalim/Adab Alim Mutaalim.pdf
Athiyah, M. A. (2009). Manahej Wa Thuruq at Tadris (Cetakan I). Darul Manahej Linnasyr wattauzi’.
Awwamah, M. (2013). Ma’alim Irsyadiyah.pdf (Cetakan I). Darul Minhaj.
Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century: assuring that what we count counts. Language Testing, 17(1), 1–42. https://doi.org/10.1191/026553200675041464
Brookfield, S. D. (2017). Becoming a Critically Reflective Teacher (2nd Editio). Jossey-Bass.
Buti, M. S. R. al. (1995). Hadza Walidi (Cetakan V). Darul Fikr Damaskus.
Chen, C., Long, J., Liu, J., Wang, Z., Wang, L., & Zhang, J. (2020). Online Academic Dishonesty of College Students: A Review. Roceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Advanced Education, Management and Social Science (AEMSS2020), 448, 156–161. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200723.121
Desrani, A., Tinggi, S., Islam, A., Bandung, S., Zamani, D. A., Islam, U., Maulana, N., & Ibrahim, M. (2021). Learning Tahfidz Al-Qur ’ an During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 18(2), 257–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2021.182-03
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The Systematic Design of Instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Donitsa-Schmidt, S., & Ramot, R. (2020). Opportunities and challenges: teacher education in Israel in the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 586–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799708
Gaytan, J. (2005). Effective Assessment Techniques for Online Instruction. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 23(1), 25–33.
George, M. W. (2008). The Element of Library Research (1st editio). PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS.
Ghanbari, N., & Nowroozi, S. (2021). The practice of online assessment in an EFL context amidst COVID-19 pandemic: views from teachers. Language Testing in Asia, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-021-00143-4
Ghuddah, A. (2001). Qiimatuz Zaman (Cetakan X). Makta al Mathbuat al Islamiyah.
Guangul, F. M., Suhail, A. H., Khalit, M. I., & Khidhir, B. A. (2020). Challenges of remote assessment in higher education in the context of COVID-19: a case study of Middle East College. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09340-w
Hafidz, U. bin. (2017). Taujiihat at Thullab ila ususil huda wasshowab (Cetakan I). Maktabah an Nur.
Harati, H., Yen, C. J., Tu, C. H., Cruickshank, B. J., & Armfield, S. W. J. (2020). Online adaptive learning: A study of score validity of the adaptive self-regulated learning model. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 15(4), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJWLTT.2020100102
Heriyati, D., & Ekasari, W. F. (2020). A Study on Academic Dishonesty and Moral Reasoning. International Journal of Education, 12(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v12i2.18653
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review. Frontiers in Education, 6(July), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
Jonassen, D. (2011). Supporting Problem Solving in PBL. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 9–27. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1256
Jones, M., & Sheridan, L. (2015). Back translation: an emerging sophisticated cyber strategy to subvert advances in ‘digital age’ plagiarism detection and prevention. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(5), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.950553
Khosravi, H., Gyamfi, G., Hanna, B. E., Lodge, J., & Abdi, S. (2021). Bridging the Gap Between Theory and Empirical Research in Evaluative Judgment. Journal of Learning Analytics, 8(3), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2021.7206
Kidd, W., & Murray, J. (2020). The Covid-19 pandemic and its effects on teacher education in England: how teacher educators moved practicum learning online. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 542–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1820480
Laal, M., & Laal, M. (2012). Collaborative learning: What is it? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(December 2012), 491–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.092
Mahabeer, P., & Pirtheepal, T. (2019). Assessment, plagiarism and its effect on academic integrity: Experiences of academics at a university in South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 115(11–12), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6323
Marshall, L. L., & Varnon, A. W. (2017). Attach on Academic Dishonesty: What “Lies” Ahead? Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 13(2), 31–40.
McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice that Enhance Student Learning and Motivation (Seventh Ed). Pearson Education.
Mohd Salleh, M. I., Alias, N. R., Hamid, H. A., & Yusoff, Z. (2013). Academic dishonesty among undergraduates in the higher education. International Journal of Academic Research, 5(2), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.7813/2075-4124.2013/5-2/b.34
Mokhtar, R., Abdul Rahman, A., & Hajar Othman, S. (2016). An Assessment-based Metamodel towards a Best Practice Assessment Model in Higher Education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(34), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i34/100825
Pallof, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2007). Building Online Learning Communities_ Effective Strategies for the Virtual Classroom (Jossey Bass Higher and Adult Education Series) ( PDFDrive ) (second edi). Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2003). The Virtual Student: A Profile and Guide to Working with Online Learners (1st Editio). Jossey-Bass.
Palloff, R. M., & Pratt, K. (2009). Assessing the Online Learner: Resources and Strategies for Faculty (first edit). Jossey-Bass.
Paullet, K., Chawdhry, A. A., Douglas, D. M., & Pinchot, J. (2016). Assessing Faculty Perceptions and Techniques to Combat Academic Dishonesty in Online Courses. Information Systems Education Journal, 14(4), 45–53.
Perveen, A. (2016). Synchronous and Asynchronous E-Language Learning - International Council for Open and Distance Education.pdf. Open Praxis, 8(1), 21–39.
Peterson, J. (2019). An analysis of academic dishonesty in online classes. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 31(1), 24–36.
Qoysi, M. A. Al. (n.d.). Majid Ayyuub Al Qoysi Manahej wathoroiqittadris, Maktabah Malik Fahd, King Saud University
Rigby, J., Cox, D., & Julian, K. (2018). Journal peer review: a bar or bridge? An analysis of a paper’s revision history and turnaround time, and the effect on citation. Scientometrics, 114(3), 1087–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2630-5
Sakandari, Ibn Athaillah, Tajul Arus al Hawi Litadzhibin Nufus, Darul Fikr Dimashq, (Cetakan V), Damascus, Suriah
Sen-akbulut, M., Umutlu, D., Oner, D., & Serkan, A. (2022). Exploring University Students’ Learning Experience in The Covid-19 Semester Through The Community of Inquiry Framework. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 1(January), 1–18.
Sharkey, S., & Weimer, M. (2003). Learner-Centered Teaching: Five Key Changes to Practice. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211318
Zabidi, M. A. (1994). Al-Zubaidi - Ithaf Al-Sadah.Pdf (Cetakan VI). Muassasah At Tarikh al Arobi, Turki
Zarnuji, A. (1981). Ta’limul Muta’allim (M. Qobani (Ed.); Cetakan I). Al Maktab Al Islami, Lebanon
1415
Views
1670
Downloads
