600
Views
459
PDF Downloads
The Comparison on 21st Century Skills of Early Childhood in Four Schools in Yogyakarta
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to determine differences in 21st-century abilities, including critical thinking, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills, in 4 schools in the Yogyakarta region. This research is a comparative survey with a research sample of 60 students.
Design/methods/approach – The data collecting techniques used in interviews with questionnaires consist of 4 21st century abilities: critical thinking skills, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills.
Findings – The survey results showed differences in 21st-century abilities between schools AR with RA, AR with TY, RA with TY, RA with RB, and TY with RB. The t-test, where the sig prove this.t value <0.05 is obtained in a row on the creative thinking ability of 0.001; 0.049; 0.00; 0.001; 0.024. Ability to think creatively in succession 0.003; 0.009; 0.000; 0.009; 0.005. 0.000 successive communication skills; 0.011; 0.000; 0.000; 0.003. Collaboration ability 0.002 consecutively; 0.001; 0.000; 0.003; 0.000. Then there is no difference between AR and RB schools. The value of sig evidences this. t > 0.05 in a row on critical thinking skills, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills 0.781; 0.702; 0.540; 0.624. The difference in ability is influenced by the learning method used.
Research implications/limitations – All study respondents were from four schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, which might limit the generalizability of the findings.
Practical implications – This research guides stakeholders of an early childhood education institution to take strategic policies in the 21st century.
Originality/value – This study contributes to the survey of differences in the abilities of early childhood in the 21st century in terms of different early childhood education institutions.
Paper type Research paper
Keywords:
Downloads
Article Details
How to Cite
Copyright
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors can enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process. It can lead to productive exchanges and earlier and greater citation of published work.
References
Abdulsyani. (1994). Sosiologi, Skematika, Teori, dan Terapan. Bumi Aksara.
Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.
Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestary, R., & Zamroni. (n.d.). Buku pengangan pembelajaran beroriantasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi.
Aulia, M., Suwatno, S., & Santoso, B. (2018). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Lisan Melalui Metode Storytelling. Jurnal MANAJERIAL, 17(1), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v17i1.9780
Awwaliyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Pengelolaan Kurikulum Dalam Menciptakan Sekolah Unggul. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 24(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v24i1.2219
Barker, A. (2011). Improve your Communication Skills: Present with confidence, Write with style, Learn skills of persuasion.
Blau, I. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?. The Internet and Higher Education, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722
Chang, E., & Simpson, D. (1997). The circle of learning: Individual and group processes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v5n7.1997
Charbonneau-Gowdy, P. (2020). Zoom-ing out: The impact of international online practicum opportunities on pre-service teachers’ development. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design (Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches). In Society.
Dewayani, T. (2020). Bekerja dari Rumah (Work From Home) dari Sudut Pandang Unit Kepatuhan Internal. Retrieved from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13014/Bekerja-dari-Rumah-Work-From-Home-Dari-Sudut-Pandang-Unit-Kepatuhan-Internal.html
Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. Univercity of Illions.
Fisher. (2001). Critical Thinking An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.
Florea, N. M., & Hurjui, E. (2015). Critical Thinking in Elementary School Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.161
Guilford. (1973). Characteristics of Creativity. State Of Illinois.
Hasanah, H., & Malik, M. N. (2020). Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cjes/article/view/5168
Hoque, E. (2016). Teaching Approaches Methodsand Techniques. International Conference on Language Education and Research.
J.L, S., & Meredith, K. . (2011). Classrom of wonder and wisdom: reading, writing and critical thinking for the 21st century. In Sage Company.
Karen Winter, Viviene Cree, Sophie Hallett, Mark Hadfield, Gillian Ruch, F. M. and S. H. (n.d.). Exploring Communication between Social Workers, Children and Young People. The British Journal of Social Work Advance, 47(5), 1427-1444. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw083
Leicester, M., & Taylor, D. (2010). Critical Thinking Across the curriculum; Developing critical thinking skills, literacy and philosophy in the primary classroom.
Lilly, F. R. (2014). Encyclopedia of Primary Prevention and Health Promotion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5999-6
Listiani, I. (2018). Efektivitas Lembar Kerja untuk Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13547
Lucas, B. (2019). Why we need to stop talking about twenty-first century skills. Seminar Series 283.
Mora, H. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008
Munastiwi, E. (2015). Implementasi pendekatan Santifik pada prndidikan Anak usia dini. 1(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/jaa.2015.12.43-50
Musfiqon, & Nurdyansyah. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik. Nizamia Learning Center Sidoarjo.
Najmah. (2011). Managemen dan Analisis, Konsep dan Aplikasi SPSS di Bidang Kesehatan. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/najmahusman/mad-konsep-p-value-dan-confidence-interval
NCTM. (2020). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/
Oktavianti, R., & Rusdi, F. (2019). Belajar Public Speaking Sebagai Komunikasi Yang Efektif. Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.24912/jbmi.v2i1.4335
Ormrod. (2009). Dasar-dasar psikologi pendidikan. Upper Saddle.
Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. (2003). Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2003.
Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31612
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).
Rogers. (2004). Berani Bicara di Depan Publik. Nuansa.
Rose, K. (2020). Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(3), 1274–1276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916740117
Runco, M. a. (2007). Creativity (6th ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.
Sani, A. H. (2015). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kaitannya Dengan Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. 57–62.
Setyosari, & Punaji. (2009). Pembelajaran Kolaborasi Landasan untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Sosial, Rasa saling Menghargai dan Tanggung Jawab. Pidato Pengukuhan Pendidik Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu TEP pada FIP UM disampaikan pada sidang terbuka Senat UM.
Sujarweni, W. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press.
Sulistyaningsih, Y., & Sunarno, W. (2017). Fisika dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Materi Fluida Dinamis Kelas XI IPA 3 Semester Genap SMA N 4 MADIUN Tahun Pelajaran 2014 / 2015. 6(3).
Suminah, E., Nugraha, A., Lestari, G. D., Mareta, & Wahyuni, M. (2015). Kurikulum Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.
Suryani, N. (2010). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Sosial Siswa. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 8(2).
Triyani, T., Herayanti, L., & Gummah, S. (2019). Effect of Scientific Approach toward Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Lensa : Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 7(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v7i1.1906
Ulfah, A. (2020). Pemanfaatan media sosial sebagai media pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di masa pandemi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa dan Sastra, (4), 410–423.
Wade, M., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., & Cisco, A. N. of. (2017). Japan at heightened risk for digital disruption, top executives say Based on data from “The Digital Vortex”, an award-winning IMD book now released in Japanese. Retrieved from https://www.imd.org/news/updates/japan-at-heightened-risk-for-digital-disruption/
Wardani, D. N., Toenlioe, A. J. E., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran Di Era 21 Dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan (JKTP), 1(1), 13–18. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287323676.pdf
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Expertise and Reason in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies and the Laboraty. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and Reasion in Cognitive Development. Camridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606915.003.
Williamson, P. K. (2011). The creative problem solving skills of arts and science students — The two cultures debate revisited. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.001
Wood, E. (2020). Learning, development and the early childhood curriculum: A critical discourse analysis of the Early Years Foundation Stage in England. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 18(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X20927726
Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). Disruptive impacts of automated driving systems on the built environment and land use: An urban planner’s perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020024.