600

Views

459

PDF Downloads

Original article
Open Access

The Comparison on 21st Century Skills of Early Childhood in Four Schools in Yogyakarta

Erni Munastiwi
Pages: 39-52
|
Published: Jun 30, 2021

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose – This study aims to determine differences in 21st-century abilities, including critical thinking, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills, in 4 schools in the Yogyakarta region. This research is a comparative survey with a research sample of 60 students.
Design/methods/approach – The data collecting techniques used in interviews with questionnaires consist of 4 21st century abilities: critical thinking skills, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills.
Findings – The survey results showed differences in 21st-century abilities between schools AR with RA, AR with TY, RA with TY, RA with RB, and TY with RB. The t-test, where the sig prove this.t value <0.05 is obtained in a row on the creative thinking ability of 0.001; 0.049; 0.00; 0.001; 0.024. Ability to think creatively in succession 0.003; 0.009; 0.000; 0.009; 0.005. 0.000 successive communication skills; 0.011; 0.000; 0.000; 0.003. Collaboration ability 0.002 consecutively; 0.001; 0.000; 0.003; 0.000. Then there is no difference between AR and RB schools. The value of sig evidences this. t > 0.05 in a row on critical thinking skills, creative thinking, communication skills, and collaboration skills 0.781; 0.702; 0.540; 0.624. The difference in ability is influenced by the learning method used.
Research implications/limitations – All study respondents were from four schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, which might limit the generalizability of the findings.
Practical implications – This research guides stakeholders of an early childhood education institution to take strategic policies in the 21st century.
Originality/value – This study contributes to the survey of differences in the abilities of early childhood in the 21st century in terms of different early childhood education institutions.


Paper type Research paper

Keywords:

21st century Critical thinking Creative thinking Communication Collaboration

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite

Munastiwi, E. (2021). The Comparison on 21st Century Skills of Early Childhood in Four Schools in Yogyakarta . Al-Athfal: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak, 7(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.14421/al-athfal.2021.71-04

References

Abdulsyani. (1994). Sosiologi, Skematika, Teori, dan Terapan. Bumi Aksara.

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to Teach. McGraw-Hill Companies.

Ariyana, Y., Pudjiastuti, A., Bestary, R., & Zamroni. (n.d.). Buku pengangan pembelajaran beroriantasi pada keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi.

Aulia, M., Suwatno, S., & Santoso, B. (2018). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Komunikasi Lisan Melalui Metode Storytelling. Jurnal MANAJERIAL, 17(1), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.17509/manajerial.v17i1.9780

Awwaliyah, R. (2019). Pendekatan Pengelolaan Kurikulum Dalam Menciptakan Sekolah Unggul. INSANIA : Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Kependidikan, 24(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v24i1.2219

Barker, A. (2011). Improve your Communication Skills: Present with confidence, Write with style, Learn skills of persuasion.

Blau, I. (2020). How does the pedagogical design of a technology-enhanced collaborative academic course promote digital literacies, self-regulation, and perceived learning of students?. The Internet and Higher Education, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.100722

Chang, E., & Simpson, D. (1997). The circle of learning: Individual and group processes. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 5(7), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.v5n7.1997

Charbonneau-Gowdy, P. (2020). Zoom-ing out: The impact of international online practicum opportunities on pre-service teachers’ development. Proceedings of the European Conference on E-Learning, ECEL.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design (Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches). In Society.

Dewayani, T. (2020). Bekerja dari Rumah (Work From Home) dari Sudut Pandang Unit Kepatuhan Internal. Retrieved from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/artikel/baca/13014/Bekerja-dari-Rumah-Work-From-Home-Dari-Sudut-Pandang-Unit-Kepatuhan-Internal.html

Ennis, R. H. (1996). Critical Thinking. Univercity of Illions.

Fisher. (2001). Critical Thinking An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Florea, N. M., & Hurjui, E. (2015). Critical Thinking in Elementary School Children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180, 565–572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.161

Guilford. (1973). Characteristics of Creativity. State Of Illinois.

Hasanah, H., & Malik, M. N. (2020). Blended learning in improving students’ critical thinking and communication skills at University. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/cjes/article/view/5168

Hoque, E. (2016). Teaching Approaches Methodsand Techniques. International Conference on Language Education and Research.

J.L, S., & Meredith, K. . (2011). Classrom of wonder and wisdom: reading, writing and critical thinking for the 21st century. In Sage Company.

Karen Winter, Viviene Cree, Sophie Hallett, Mark Hadfield, Gillian Ruch, F. M. and S. H. (n.d.). Exploring Communication between Social Workers, Children and Young People. The British Journal of Social Work Advance, 47(5), 1427-1444. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcw083

Leicester, M., & Taylor, D. (2010). Critical Thinking Across the curriculum; Developing critical thinking skills, literacy and philosophy in the primary classroom.

Lilly, F. R. (2014). Encyclopedia of Primary Prevention and Health Promotion. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-5999-6

Listiani, I. (2018). Efektivitas Lembar Kerja untuk Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13547

Lucas, B. (2019). Why we need to stop talking about twenty-first century skills. Seminar Series 283.

Mora, H. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008

Munastiwi, E. (2015). Implementasi pendekatan Santifik pada prndidikan Anak usia dini. 1(2), 43–50. https://doi.org/10.14421/jaa.2015.12.43-50

Musfiqon, & Nurdyansyah. (2015). Pendekatan Pembelajaran Saintifik. Nizamia Learning Center Sidoarjo.

Najmah. (2011). Managemen dan Analisis, Konsep dan Aplikasi SPSS di Bidang Kesehatan. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/najmahusman/mad-konsep-p-value-dan-confidence-interval

NCTM. (2020). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Retrieved from https://www.nctm.org/Standards-and-Positions/Principles-and-Standards/

Oktavianti, R., & Rusdi, F. (2019). Belajar Public Speaking Sebagai Komunikasi Yang Efektif. Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1), 117–122. https://doi.org/10.24912/jbmi.v2i1.4335

Ormrod. (2009). Dasar-dasar psikologi pendidikan. Upper Saddle.

Pendidikan, M., Kebudayaan, D. A. N., & Indonesia, R. (2003). Undang-Undang No.20 Tahun 2003.

Pratiwi, S. N., Cari, C., & Aminah, N. S. (2019). Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21 dengan Literasi Sains Siswa. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 9(1), 34–42. Retrieved from https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/jmpf/article/view/31612

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1).

Rogers. (2004). Berani Bicara di Depan Publik. Nuansa.

Rose, K. (2020). Scientists’ incentives and attitudes toward public communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(3), 1274–1276. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916740117

Runco, M. a. (2007). Creativity (6th ed.). Elsevier Academic Press.

Sani, A. H. (2015). Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kaitannya Dengan Menumbuhkan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. 57–62.

Setyosari, & Punaji. (2009). Pembelajaran Kolaborasi Landasan untuk Mengembangkan Keterampilan Sosial, Rasa saling Menghargai dan Tanggung Jawab. Pidato Pengukuhan Pendidik Besar dalam Bidang Ilmu TEP pada FIP UM disampaikan pada sidang terbuka Senat UM.

Sujarweni, W. (2014). Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. Pustaka Baru Press.

Sulistyaningsih, Y., & Sunarno, W. (2017). Fisika dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Materi Fluida Dinamis Kelas XI IPA 3 Semester Genap SMA N 4 MADIUN Tahun Pelajaran 2014 / 2015. 6(3).

Suminah, E., Nugraha, A., Lestari, G. D., Mareta, & Wahyuni, M. (2015). Kurikulum Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Direktorat Pembinaan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.

Suryani, N. (2010). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kolaboratif Untuk Meningkatkan Ketrampilan Sosial Siswa. Majalah Ilmiah Pembelajaran, 8(2).

Triyani, T., Herayanti, L., & Gummah, S. (2019). Effect of Scientific Approach toward Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. Lensa : Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 7(1), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-lkf.v7i1.1906

Ulfah, A. (2020). Pemanfaatan media sosial sebagai media pembelajaran bahasa Indonesia di masa pandemi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Bahasa dan Sastra, (4), 410–423.

Wade, M., Loucks, J., Macaulay, J., & Cisco, A. N. of. (2017). Japan at heightened risk for digital disruption, top executives say Based on data from “The Digital Vortex”, an award-winning IMD book now released in Japanese. Retrieved from https://www.imd.org/news/updates/japan-at-heightened-risk-for-digital-disruption/

Wardani, D. N., Toenlioe, A. J. E., & Wedi, A. (2018). Daya Tarik Pembelajaran Di Era 21 Dengan Blended Learning. Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan (JKTP), 1(1), 13–18. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/287323676.pdf

Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Expertise and Reason in Creative Thinking: Evidence from Case Studies and the Laboraty. In J.C. Kaufman & J. Baer (Eds.), Creativity and Reasion in Cognitive Development. Camridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511606915.003.

Williamson, P. K. (2011). The creative problem solving skills of arts and science students — The two cultures debate revisited. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2010.08.001

Wood, E. (2020). Learning, development and the early childhood curriculum: A critical discourse analysis of the Early Years Foundation Stage in England. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 18(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476718X20927726

Yigitcanlar, T. (2019). Disruptive impacts of automated driving systems on the built environment and land use: An urban planner’s perspective. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5020024.

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo