119

Views

101

Downloads

Original article
Open Access

A Self-Assessment Instrument for Early Childhood Teachers: Construct Validity and Reliability Analysis

Martha Christianti
,
Harun
,
Nur Hayati
,
Oktaviani Maharani
,
Nazaludin Nur Rahmat
,
Apry Aditya Saputra
,
Triandi Aprilio
Pages: 29-41
|
Published: Mar 31, 2025

Main Article Content

Abstract

Early childhood education teachers in Indonesia often lack standardized tools to assess their pedagogical and professional competence. This study aims to develop and validate a reliable self-evaluation instrument by identifying key competency dimensions to support early childhood teachers in reflecting on their professional practices. The instrument consists of 39 items encompassing seven competency dimensions: evaluation and reflection skills, holistic educational approach, curriculum mastery, learning activity design, professionalism, technology integration, and communication. Data were collected using a 4-point Likert scale from 276 respondents for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and 978 respondents for confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA was used to identify the instrument's underlying factor structure, while CFA tested the model's fit with empirical data. The EFA results indicate that seven factors with eigenvalues greater than 1 were extracted, explaining 60.378% of the total variance across the 39 items. CFA results confirm that the conceptual model aligns with empirical data, with all standardized loading factors found to be significant. Construct reliability, measured using Composite Reliability (CR), shows that four of the seven dimensions have satisfactory reliability (CR > 0.70), while the remaining three dimensions demonstrate moderate reliability. This study contributes to early childhood education by presenting a validated and reliable self-assessment instrument to measure early childhood teachers’ pedagogical and professional competence. The instrument supports teachers in reflecting on their teaching practices and promotes ongoing professional development. It also offers a foundational tool for policymakers and institutions to improve teacher quality. Future research can examine its applicability in various educational contexts and evaluate its effectiveness in guiding targeted development programs.

Keywords:

self-evaluation assessment ECE teachers construct validity reliability factor analysis

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Article Details

How to Cite

Christianti, M., Harun, Nur Hayati, Oktaviani Maharani, Nazaludin Nur Rahmat, Apry Aditya Saputra, & Triandi Aprilio. (2025). A Self-Assessment Instrument for Early Childhood Teachers: Construct Validity and Reliability Analysis. Golden Age: Jurnal Ilmiah Tumbuh Kembang Anak Usia Dini, 10(1), 29–41. https://doi.org/10.14421/jga.2025.101-03

References

Al Riyami, T. (2015). Reflection: Is it a promising or spurious tool for teachers’ professional development? International Journal of Bilingual & Multilingual Teachers of English, 03(01), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.12785/ijbmte/030105

Alhassan, A., & Ali, H. I. H. (2019). Towards a multi-source performance appraisal model in omani higer education institutions. 10(4), 299–312.

Bank, W. (2020). The promise of education in Indonesia. In The World Bank. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/34807

Best, D. A. (2016). Developing urban elementary teacher leaders using danielson’s framework: An action reserach study.

Boud, D. (2015). Feedback: Ensuring that it leads to enhanced learning. The Clinical Teacher’s Toolbox, 12, 3–7.

Buyamin, B. (2023). Implementation of teacher performance assessment program. Porceeding of International Conference on Education, Society and Humanity, 01(01), 338–347. https://www.ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/icesh/article/view/5646

Cohen, J., & Goldhaber, D. (2016). Building a more complete understanding of teacher evaluation using classroom observations. Educational Researcher, 45(6), 378–387. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16659442

Damanik, R. (2019). Hubungan kompetensi guru dengan kinerja guru. Jurnal Serunai Administrasi Pendidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.37755/jsap.v8i2.170

Danielson, C. (2008). Enhancing professional practice: A framework for teaching (Second Edi). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD).

Darling-Hammond, L. (2015). Can value added add value to teacher evaluation? Educational Researcher, 44(2), 132–137. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X15575346

Filgueiras, A., Pires, P., & Landeira-Fernandez, J. (2014). Screening measures used in child daycare centers: A 15-years systematic review. Psychology, 05(19), 2109–2119. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2014.519213

Filipe, M. N. M., Ferreira, F. A. F., & Santos, S. P. (2015). A multiple criteria information system for pedagogical evaluation and professional development of teachers. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(11), 1769–1782. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2014.129

Fireside, D., & Lachlan-Hache, L. (2015). Uncommon measures : Teacher self-evaluation to encourage professional growth (Issue November).

Fitria, H., Kristiawan, M., & Rahmat, N. (2019). Upaya meningkatkan kompetensi guru melalui pelatihan penelitian tindakan kelas. Abdimas Unwahas, 4(1), 14–25. https://doi.org/10.62509/ji.v1i1.20

Gates, B., & Gates, M. (2010). Learning about teaching. In Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203464014_chapter_2

Goh, A. Y. S. (2019). Rethinking reflective practice in professional lifelong learning using learning metaphors. Studies in Continuing Education, 41(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2018.1474867

Grissom, J. A., Kalogrides, D., & Loeb, S. (2015). Using student test scores to measure principal performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 37(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373714523831

Hartono, S., & Muchtar, D. Y. (2018). Uji validitas konstruk pada instrumen dengan metode confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 6(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v6i1.8155

Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Juma, A. A. (2024). Self-reflection in teaching: A comprehensive guide to empowering educators and enhancing student learning. International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 12(1), 2835–2844. https://doi.org/10.30574/ijsra.2024.12.1.1113

Kane, T. J., Kerr, K. A., & Pianta, R. C. (2014). Designing teacher evaluation systems. Jossey-Bass A Wiley Brand.

Kelly, S., Bringe, R., Aucejo, E., & Fruehwirth, J. (2020). Using global observation protocols to inform research on teaching effectiveness and school improvement: Strengths and emerging limitations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.14507/EPAA.28.5012

Kementrian Pendidikan Nasional RI. (2014). Standar Nasional Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini No 137 Tahun 2014. In Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://portaldik.id/assets/upload/peraturan/PERMEN KEMENDIKBUD Nomor 137 Tahun 2014 STANDAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI.pdf

Kraft, M. A., & Gilmour, A. F. (2016). Can principals promote teacher development as evaluators? A case study of principals’ views and experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(5), 711–753. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X16653445

Kusumawardhani, P. N. (2017). Does teacher certification program lead to better quality teachers? Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 25(6), 590–618. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1329405

Maghfuroh, L., Salimo, H., Qadrijati, I., & Subiyanto, A. A. (2020). Early childhood education teachers in Indonesia : Validity and reliability of preschool child development surveillance instruments. Migration Letters, 20(8), 1079–1089.

Manggaberani, A. A., & Putro, N. H. (2023). Development of character assessment instrument on english learning for junior high school students. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(1), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.47006/ijierm.v5i3.282

Moss, J. T. (2015). The danielson model of teacher evaluation: Exploring teacher perceptions concerning its value in shaping and improving instructional practice.

Neumann, M. M., Anthony, J. L., Erazo, N. A., Neumann, D. L., Neumann, M. M., & Anthony, J. L. (2019). Assessment and technology : Mapping future directions in the early childhood classroom. Frontiers in Education, 4(October), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00116

Nur Efendi, & Muh Ibnu Sholeh. (2023). Manajemen pendidikan dalam meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran. Academicus: Journal of Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.59373/academicus.v2i2.25

Otaya, L. G., Kartowagiran, B., Retnawati, H., & Mustakim, S. S. (2020). Estimating the ability of pre-service and in-service Teacher Profession Education (TPE) participants using Item Response Theory. Research and Evaluation in Education, 6(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i2.36043

Öztabak, M. Ü., & Polatlar, D. Y. (2020). An overview of the administrative issues in preschools from preschool teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Education and Learning, 9(6), 183. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v9n6p183

Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thingking skills and its learning strategy. Problem of Education in The 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. http://repository.seku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/63%0Ahttps://hungary.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/on-synergies-and-conflicts-between-the-sustainable-development-go

Rista, B. V, Agung, A. G., & Ujianti, P. R. (2020). Validity and reliability: An ability assessment instrument to identify the number concept. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 3(3), 144–152. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/view/30614%0Ahttps://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/download/30614/pdf

Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

Shaffer, J. A., DeGeest, D., & Li, A. (2016). Tackling the problem of construct proliferation: A guide to assessing the discriminant validity of conceptually related constructs. Organizational Research Methods, 19(1), 80–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115598239

Sholeh, M. (2017). Keefektifan peran kepala sekolah dalam meningkatkan kinerja guru. Jurnal Dinamika Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 41. https://doi.org/10.26740/jdmp.v1n1.p41-54

Smith, C., & Gillespie, M. (2023). Research on professional Development and Teacher Change: Implications for Adult Basic Education. In Review of adult learning and literacy: Vol.7: Connecting research, policy, and practice (Vol. 7, pp. 205–244). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003417996-7

Supadi, S., Soraya, E., Muhammad, H., & Halim, N. (2021). Making sense the teacher evaluation with the value of local culture (The voice of school principals in Indonesia). International Journal of Educational Management, 35(6), 1124–1135. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2020-0408

Suranto, S., Muhyadi, M., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi uji kompetensi keahlian (ukk) administrasi perkantoran di smk. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 98–114. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2127

Suryadarma, D., & Jones, G. W. (2015). Education in indonesia; Rising to the challenge. In OECD. https://doi.org/10.2307/3023860

Umar, J., & Nisa, Y. F. (2020). Uji validitas konstruk dengan CFA dan pelaporannya. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v9i2.16964